On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:59:37PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > The fix should be somehow unclumsified, though. Currently I inject > some horrible runtime testing in the configure script to find out > whether the clib supports the %zu format of C99, but that breaks > crosscompilability (which I'm not sure worked before, but still...) What is the problem with just assuming that %zu works? C99 is not 7 years old and this is one of the easier things. > Would it be safe to assume that a size_t can always be cast losslessly > to an unsigned long (and then printed with %lu), or are there systems > on which only an unsigned long long will do? unsigned long is not sufficient. Bastian -- Captain's Log, star date 21:34.5...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature