Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities
On 6/6/06, Otavio Salvador <email@example.com> wrote:
"Gustavo Franco" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Agreed. Btw, it would be better keep Etch package descriptions updated
> during its support cycle, but i think it's impossible with the
> infrascture we've, right ?
No. We already have the previous working structure all up and
running. What we want to do is improve it.
Does it mean that we've infrastructure to keep updating Etch package
descriptions during it support cycle? Is it the plan?