Re: Sun Java available from non-free
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 22:41, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 24 May 2006, MJ Ray outgrape:
> > Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Anthony Towns already mentioned: 'both James and Jeroen had
> > extensive contact with Sun to ensure that the tricky clauses were
> > actually okay' so surely there was some doubt?
> There was perhaps no doubt after clarification and discussions
> with sun? In that case, there wou,d be no need to waste time and
> energy dealing with -legal.
Would the Secretary then please post the legally binding document
signed by Sun which clarifies and/or amends Sun's license.