[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [draft] Re: Sun Java available from non-free

Michael wrote:
> > Speaking realistically, such a move of Sun would be spectacularly bad PR
> > for them esp. considering their statements about future Java licensing
> > efforts they have committed to.
> That's true. But why did they release this license and used no other
> wording?
> You essantially say, why worry about a license if it's bad PR too sue
> the licensees. I doubt it really works that way. After all you could, at
> some point somehow, get into a situation where Sun doesn't care about
> the PR effect.

True.  We only have to look at the once-noble company called Santa Cruz
Operations for a real-life example.


Reply to: