Re: RFC: Better portability for package maintainers
Alex Ross <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> The following is based on premises that portability is good and
> that POSIX is a standard. A proposal.
> Over the last couple months we've built about gazillion Ubuntu/Dapper
> packages. The process is heavily automated (, , ).
> And so, to lookup the result of the XYZ build (where XYZ is a source package
> in question), simply click on a link that looks like this:
> For instance, take two randomly selected packages: galeon  and
> fam .
Lets also take atlas3 so we see something interesting:
Installed means Debian has it in the archive, Failed means the buildd
admin has set the package to failed and Failure means there is a
buildd log with maybe-failed but no admin action for it.