Re: alternatives and priorities
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <email@example.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 03:25:28PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> Fixing this wasn't very hard, but it made me consider why we let a
>> maintainer decide what the alternative priority of an editor would be.
> Mm -- I always wondered why xfce-session-manager had a priority over
> gnome-session-manager by default. (One might argue that GNOME is installed by
> default, though, so if a user installs XFCE that's a conscious choice...)
> /* Steinar */
Similary any vi extension should top vi itself. Also zile, emacs,
xemacs build kind of a progression.