Re: Making init scripts use dash
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:29:47PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:27:23PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > This option also might imply some extra bugs, but it's believed that
> > not so many, since there are already quite a number of people with
> > /bin/sh -> /bin/dash, and they do file bugs when "bashisms" appear.
> It's also influencing the whole system, including any #!/bin/sh scripts
> that anyone might have installed locally. It's very easy to make a
> bashism that then will fail to work with /bin/sh, I think the risk of
> breaking things of users is way too high for me to consider this. Bash
> is a very decent all-round shell.
Many non-Linux systems don't even have bash *installed* by default.
FreeBSD, for example, comes with a POSIX-compatible /bin/sh which is not
Since bash does enable some features that are not specified in POSIX,
even when called as /bin/sh, I don't see what the problem would be of
installing "something else" as our default /bin/sh (ignoring the fact
that only bash is Essential: yes for a second). It would greatly improve
portability of said non-Debian scripts.
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4