Re: gcc 4.1 or not

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gcc 4.1 or not
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:30:35 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060511143035.GK7827@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 5fabd6fd0605110720l26df3be6ta7fc7e1cf0fb13f3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 20060510211048.GJ11995@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 20060511064216.GX5390@country.grep.be> <[🔎] 20060511080046.GQ9262@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 20060511125525.GA22140@deprecation.cyrius.com> <[🔎] 5fabd6fd0605110720l26df3be6ta7fc7e1cf0fb13f3@mail.gmail.com>

* Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org> [2006-05-11 11:20]:
> Why you did this metabug thing, and not just usertagged the bugs ? The
> results seems to be similar, but i don't think that a metabug can be
> managed by email, usertags are.

What can not be managed by email?
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc 4.1 or not
  - From: "Gustavo Franco" <gustavorfranco@gmail.com>

References:
- gcc 4.1 or not
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: gcc 4.1 or not
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: gcc 4.1 or not
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: gcc 4.1 or not
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: gcc 4.1 or not
  - From: "Gustavo Franco" <stratus@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: gcc 4.1 or not
Next by Date: Bug#366834: ITP: cxxtools -- library of unrelated, but useful C++ classes
Previous by thread: Re: gcc 4.1 or not
Next by thread: Re: gcc 4.1 or not
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread