Re: Trouble with some X applications.
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 12:13:38PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Sa den 29. Apr 2006 um 12:08 schrieb Andrew Donnellan:
> > >That whould be a catastrope. As 2.6 is miles from stable a 2.6 kernel is
> > >no kernel for stable servers. (Well, my system with sid is not in this
> >
> > Not stable?!?! It's been around for several years now. Please ask on -user.
>
> Its not a question. Its a fact!
No, it's not a fact, it's your personal opinion. I don't doubt that
there are cases where the 2.4 kernel is more stable than the 2.6 kernel,
but I highly question your earlier statement that the futex:es are
broken, since a lot of other people would've experienced and reported
the problem in that case. And if you really believe that the kernel
maintainers don't want to fix certain bugs, you're really out on thin
ice. They might, however, disagree with your opinion that a certain
behaviour is a bug at all...
Regards: David Weinehall
--
/) David Weinehall <tao@debian.org> /) Rime on my window (\
// ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire //
\) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/
Reply to: