Re: Bug#363598: udev should conflict with ifrename
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 20, Michael Biebl <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Besides the fact that ifrename is more of a hack, now that udev enables
> > persistent naming of interfaces (z25_persistent-net.rules) udev should
> > conflict with ifrename. Otherwise the user could get unexpected results
> > if /etc/iftab still exists and the ifrename init script tries to rename the
> > interfaces (again) with possibly different names than the ones set in
> > z25_persistent-net.rules.
> If you have not noticed yet, the latest udev release by default
> automatically generates rules to have persistent names for network
> I am inclined to agree with the bug reporter, but I want to double check
> and ask if anybody has other arguments.
I use ifrename to give useful names to interfaces and just because udev
may be able to do this now as well does not mean they should conflict.
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred. | : :' : The universal
| `. `' Operating System
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/