Re: glibc_2.3.6-6_i386.changes REJECTED

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: glibc_2.3.6-6_i386.changes REJECTED
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:34:46 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060411133446.GL8423@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200604111527.00151.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
References: <E1FSxtS-0001i9-MN@spohr.debian.org> <[🔎] 200604111151.27226.pierre.habouzit@m4x.org> <[🔎] 87bqv81cpl.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <[🔎] 200604111527.00151.aragorn@tiscali.nl>

* Frans Pop (aragorn@tiscali.nl) [060411 15:27]:
> On Tuesday 11 April 2006 15:08, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > When doing a full upgrade (stable->unstable) could it happen that apt
> > breaks the libc6<->libc-bin depends cycle and put them into seperate
> > dpkg calls? I don't remember how smart/stupid libapt was there. It
> > might be best to add "apt-get install libc6 libc-bin" to the upgrade
> > instructions.
> 
> If that is needed, please file a bug report against release-notes.

But it would better if that wouldn't be needed at all.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/

Reply to:

References:
- Re: glibc_2.3.6-6_i386.changes REJECTED
  - From: Pierre Habouzit <pierre.habouzit@m4x.org>
- Re: glibc_2.3.6-6_i386.changes REJECTED
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Re: glibc_2.3.6-6_i386.changes REJECTED
  - From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: glibc_2.3.6-6_i386.changes REJECTED
Next by Date: Re: glibc_2.3.6-6_i386.changes REJECTED
Previous by thread: Re: glibc_2.3.6-6_i386.changes REJECTED
Next by thread: Re: glibc_2.3.6-6_i386.changes REJECTED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread