[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ???????????????????? ????????????????!



According to Jacob S,
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:48:38 -0800
> Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca> wrote:
> 
> > On Thursday 23 March 2006 02:41, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > > Scripsit Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
> > >
> > > > On Wednesday 22 March 2006 09:45, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > > >> Listmasters have been trying to
> > > >> identify the responsible subscriber with no luck
> > > >
> > > > Why not just 500 all posts from sites known to use
> > > > challenge-response?
> > >
> > > The challenges are send directly from the idiot site to the From
> > > address in the list posting. They do not pass through Debian
> > > machines.
> > 
> > However, in the future, people from that site would not be able to
> > confirm their subscription in the first place if their site uses
> > challenge-response.
> 
> Except that, as has been discussed many times before... 1) the C-Rs are
> coming from uol.com.br 2) there are some legitimate users that post from
> uol.com.br that do not have C-R on their accounts 3) the problem
> address is not a uol.com.br account - the problem account has their
> mail forwarded to a uol.com.br account, so the listmasters have not
> been able to track down the problem account. 
> 
> So you would be blocking a lot of innocent users and the problem
> account would still be on the list.

Do the people on uol.com.br have a choice?  Perhaps they
could vote with their wallets?



Reply to: