On Tue, 07 Mar 2006, Brian May wrote: > On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 19:04 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > > > > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > > > block 322762 with 355341 > > Bug#322762: /usr/doc still exists (transition tracking bug) > > Was blocked by: 189856 190020 203278 254800 254913 254924 254930 255590 256250 302504 319726 320084 320103 321926 322749 322769 322772 322775 322776 322778 322779 322781 322782 322783 322784 322785 322786 322787 322788 322789 322790 322791 322792 322793 322794 322795 322797 322798 322799 322800 322801 322803 322804 322805 322806 322807 322808 322809 322810 322811 322812 322813 322814 322815 322816 322817 322818 322819 322820 322828 322829 322830 322831 322832 322833 322834 322835 322837 322838 322839 352893 352894 353569 > > Blocking bugs added: 355341 > > What does the "block" command do? I have never seen it documented > anywhere, including at <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/>. Did I miss > something? Indicates that a bug cannot be closed/fixed/addressed until the bugs that it is blocked by are closed. See #342938 et al. for more information about the documentation bug. Don Armstrong -- I now know how retro SCOs OSes are. Riotous, riotous stuff. How they had the ya-yas to declare Linux an infant OS in need of their IP is beyond me. Upcoming features? PAM. files larger than 2 gigs. NFS over TCP. The 80's called, they want their features back. -- Compactable Dave http://www3.sympatico.ca/dcarpeneto/sco.html http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature