Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main
Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:19:05PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Let's see, maybe you didn't read the paragraph where I said:
>
> I did.
>
>> Is this CIPE? Or is that some other case?
>
> No, it's not CIPE. I guess you have some more reading to do.
Ah, a brief search turns up. CIPE is then the sort of thing I was
thinking about when I wrote:
Or, perhaps it's not true that there are no free drivers for it. The
claim was also made that there was a single free driver out there for
use with ndiswrapper, but others claimed that the hardware in question
is already supported, and better, without the use of that driver. I
don't know whether this is true, but if it is true, I would appreciate
hearing why that should be treated differently than there being no
such free driver at all.
According to what I've read, the driver is already supported, and
better, without the use of ndiswrapper. But perhaps what I've read is
inaccurate?
Thomas
Reply to: