Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main
Adam McKenna <email@example.com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 01:30:25PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Help me out then. You seemed to suggest that not putting ndiswrapper
>> in main would be to "ignore rules that are very clearly laid out in
>> the SC and DFSG."
> I suggested that the CTTE overriding the developer's judgement in this
> instance would be an abuse of power, since the DFSG and SC (not to mention
> policy) clearly spell out the requirements for main, and ndiswrapper clearly
> meets them.
I think this is clearly incorrect. The DFSG and the SC do not say
anything about the requirements for main that I can see.
And it is the *job* of the tech-ctte to resolve disputes.