[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Apache2 bugs status

Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 1/21/06, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> wrote:
>> Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>> A lot of those bugs are quite old and some appear to be trivial to
>>> fix, but they don't have a single response from you.
>>> Could you please tell why?
>> Most likely because the bugs are non-issues and should simply be closed.
> Really? Interesting. Why do you think they are non-issues?

See below...

>> Which bug report exactly seems to cause problems for you?
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341022

As stated in the bug report, a configerror that happens _after_ the
'administrator' has modified it.

> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267477

There is no 'simple' way of doing this, especially as people who want
SSL either need to create a snakeoil certificate or want to use their
own. It can't be automated, people should simply read the documentation,
which is already included.

> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289868

As marked by ASF: Invalid bug.

> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291841

Ever ran a log analysis program?

> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=325594

Just kill the old one, start the new one.

> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=338472

Both /server-info and /server-status are commented out.
If somebody wants to enable them they can also stick them
directly in the virtualhost they want.

> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=349016

Wishlist item.

Any bugs which are deadly and critical except for the fact that you
don't want to read documentation a bit?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: