On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Christopher Martin wrote: > No, because as I wrote the whole point of the amendment is to make > officially acceptable the interpretation of the license which views > the license as flawed, but still DFSG-free. This amendment is in no > way arguing for any sort of exception or modification or suspension > of the DFSG. The issue here devolves into a question of interpretation; if we can decide to interpret the Foundation Documents in any way we want simply by a majority vote, the requirement to have changes to them meet a 3:1 majority becomes rather pointless. Don Armstrong -- Filing a bug is probably not going to get it fixed any faster. -- Anthony Towns http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature