Re: bits from the release team
Josselin Mouette <email@example.com> writes:
> Le mercredi 04 janvier 2006 à 14:21 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
>> On Jan 04, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> > udev has broken my system -- completely (as in: can't boot and/or log in) --
>> > _seven_ distinct times since this summer. How on you can claim that ALSA is
>> > worse, is beyond me :-)
>> This was not always caused by udev bugs.
>> And anyway, it's called unstable for a reason. udev in stable is stable.
> Unstable means dependencies can be broken, not that packages themselves
> can always broken. Each and every single package uploaded to unstable
> should be of release quality. Otherwise, it should go to experimental.
Dude, how many people do you think would test a udev package in
experimental? I could count them on one hand. It's impossible to get a
package like udev to be of "release quality" if no one tests it.
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.