[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Experiment: poll on "switching to vim-tiny for standard vi?"

On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 11:47:05AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 23-Dec-05, 11:54 (CST), Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: 
> > The size of base matters a little, but it's not an "every byte is
> > sacred" situation.
> > Cheers, aj (base maintainer, for those playing along at home)
> So, it seems that so far as Stefano (vim maintainer) and I (nvi
> maintainer) are concerned, you and Joey get to make the call on this. Since
> Joey initiated this thread, I think we can assume he's in favor of
> the change. How say you?

I still think the vi provided by vim-tiny needs to default to compatible
mode and no-auto-indenting; but afaik it still doesn't.

> If you agree with the change, do Stefano and I need to do anything
> other than swap vi alternative priorities and swap important<->optional
> priorities?

No, I don't think so.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: