Re: StrongARM tactics
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > [1] http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/architecture.php?a=arm
>
> taking a "random" (end of alphabet) sample from maybe-failed:
>
> twinkle: requeue (probably libccrtp was stuck in NEW)
> wvstreams: Dep-Wait (libxplc0.3.13-dev) - dep in new queue, see #340696
> xchm: retry (needed libchm-dev)
>
> xmms-openspc: arch specific (says maintainer in control)
> zinc-compiler: arch specific dependency (ghc6)
>
> visualboyadvance: buggy, could requeue to get #334727
> weechat: don't know, error on dh-strip on 5 archs, no bug filed
>
> That's 2 out of 7 which need actual debugging, both not arm-specific.
>
> If you're deperate for people looking at build-failures, that's OK, but
> only few of them seem really arm-specific.
The number of Maybe-Failed packages doesn't tell much. A while ago I
went through it for mips and found that the vast majority consists of
- Packages which should be in P-a-s
- Packages which should be in state Dep-Wait
- Packages which are broken in the same obvious way for several
architectures
Thiemo
Reply to: