Hi,
Rationale:
I have been thinking about the kinds of reasons for not
wanting to have a post to -private published. I came up with two
major (reasonable) scenarios:
a) The post contained sensitive material.
In this case, if a reasonable case has been made for the
material being sensitive, and one that the declassification
teams accepted, then the material should be redacted from the
post, and every post it has been quoted in. If it is sensitive
in one post, it is sensitive in another.
b) I do not want to be associated with the post in question
In other words, if this showed up in google it may hurt my
future job prospects post ;-). In this case, the post can be
published, just every identifying bit about the author needs
be redacted from this post and the quotes.
This latter action would, in my opinion, allow more of some
informative, though heated, discussions to be available to posterity
<grin>.
Also, we are, in effect, considering retroactively overturning
a published privacy policy; I think that we do need to state up front
that the copyright holders wishes would be heeded, even when the post
in question is quoted in other emails.
Here is a diff from AJ's proposal. I am now formally seeking
seconds for this modified proposal, which has explicit guidelines for
the most common case for not wantng the posts to be published.
manoj
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian will
seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing significance
made to the Debian Private Mailing List.
This process will be undertaken under the following constraints:
* The Debian Project Leader will delegate one or more volunteers
to form the "debian-private declassification team".
* The team will automatically declassify and publish posts made to
that list that are three or more years old, with the following
exceptions:
- the author and other individuals quoted in messages being reviewed
will be contacted, and allowed between four and eight weeks
to comment;
- posts that reveal financial information about individuals or
organisations other than Debian, will have that information
removed;
- - requests by the author of a post for that post not to be published
- will be honoured;
+ - If the author makes a resonable case that some material is
+ sensitive, then that material is redacted from that post and any
+ other post where it has been quoted
+
+ - If the author indicates he does not wish to be associated with a
+ post, any identifying information is redacted from that post,
+ and any quotes in subsequent posts, but the rest of the material
+ is published.
- posts of no historical or other relevance, such as vacation
- announcements, or posts that have no content after personal
+ announcements, or posts that have no content after
information is removed, will not be published, unless the author
requests they be published;
- comments by others who would be affected by the publication of
the post will also be taken into account by the declassification
team;
- the list of posts to be declassified will be made available to
developers two weeks before publication, so that the decisions
of the team may be overruled by the developer body by General
Resolution, if necessary -- in the event such a resolution is
introduced (ie, proposed and sponsored), the declassification
and publication of messages specified by the resolution will be
deferred until the resolution has been voted on.
---
--
Happiness adds and multiplies as we divide it with others.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Attachment:
pgp1MuNv6adN1.pgp
Description: PGP signature