On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 08:22:35PM +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > >>[1] yes, recently a thread talked right about curl and openssl vs. > >> gnutls, but evidently i didn't see what i call a general > >> consensus. > >IMHO provide both, ssl and gnutls. > I can only agree. > Even when libcurl works identically good using either library, OpenSSL and > GnuTLS differ not only license-wise but they also have features of their > own and bugs of their own. Limiting the libcurl offer to use only one of > them will cause grief at some point in some camp(s), that's for sure. Er, it's only SSL/TLS. The correct long-term answer to "they each have bugs" is "fix the bugs in [libcurl's support for] GnuTLS", not "let the users pick which set of bugs they like better". -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature