Re: net-tools maintenance status
On 8/5/05, Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de> wrote:
> In article <[🔎] b2cc26e4050805134061646e4e@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> >> I have attached it to the bug.
> > Thanks. But: It's not ready yet, but what do you think of it?
>
> It is not ready yet :)
Didn't I (also) send you a much later version?
> No seriously I think the idea with having the column width in *_width is
> fine. I would add a calculation of it based on COLUMS if and only if COLUMNS
> is > 80 and --wide is given. I am not sure how to react if output is not a
> tty. One option is to always asume a very wide line, the other is to stick
> with columns. For beeing compatible with parsing scripts I think the output
> without wide option should not change (however I think everybody who is
> arsing netstat output is insane)
The later version auto-sets the wide option if there's a tty and
detects the width of the tty.
Reply to: