Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On 20050708T181259-0400, Johan Kullstam wrote: >>What signal is meant by 3.1 versus 4.0? Does your intended audience >>have any concept of the distinction? > > The usual distinction, when it is made, is that bumping the major number > indicates a disruptive upgrade (changing how things work, not just > adding new things). > the change of gcc 3 to gcc 3 is disruptive (to c++ binaries) a.