On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:56:51PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote : > Le vendredi 08 juillet 2005 ? 06:46 +0900, Junichi Uekawa a ?crit : > > > > 1. It's linking with openssl, and claiming to be LGPL, which > > > > I understand to be incompatible. > > > > > > It is compatible. > > > > Are you sure? > > People were running around GPL is not compatible with > > openssl license; and LGPL has a option to make the > > code GPL. > > The point of the LGPL is to avoid such incompatibilities. If you can > link it with proprietary code, you can also link it to code under the > OpenSSL license. > > That said, I think too we should favor libgcrypt, because it has a > lighter security record. I mailed him about that and SONAME versionning. Regards, -- Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature