Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?

To: Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
From: René van Bevern <rvb@pro-linux.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:15:23 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050708071522.GA2570@negoyl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1120787845.7684.10.camel@pug.anu.edu.au>
References: <[🔎] 1120787845.7684.10.camel@pug.anu.edu.au>

On  8.07.05, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I'm already seeing documentation referring to "Debian 3.2 (etch)".  Is
> this really what we want?

It should be 3.14, followed by a 3.141 release. ;)

    René

Attachment: pgpZWqdSh64fs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
  - From: Bryan Gruneberg <bryan@hbgtech.com>

References:
- should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
  - From: Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Work-needing packages report for Jul 8, 2005
Next by Date: Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
Previous by thread: Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
Next by thread: Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread