Re: Debian Java in Sarge
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Debian Java in Sarge
- From: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 18:56:00 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20050703165600.GB5164@opalsys.net>
- Mail-followup-to: opal@debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Reply-to: opal@debian.org
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506041717020.1634@gradall.private.brainfood.com>
- References: <874qcfcuve.fsf@oz.fapse.ulg.ac.be> <20050603161647.GA2517@miami.familiasanchez.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506031837410.1675@gradall.private.brainfood.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506031841380.1675@gradall.private.brainfood.com> <1117921757.7311.6.camel@arrakis.localnet> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506041717020.1634@gradall.private.brainfood.com>
Hello
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 05:17:18PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > Le vendredi 03 juin 2005 à 18:41 -0500, Adam Heath a écrit :
> > > > I agree. A java policy should talk about how java packages should interact
> > > > once installed. But stay the hell away from how they are built.
> > >
> > > As an example, debhelper, while being very useful for maintainers, is not
> > > mandated.
> >
> > That doesn't make not using it less stupid. The few times I saw a
> > package not using debhelper, it was broken in some way.
>
> Of course. That doesn't mean it should be mandated.
>
>
Please do not mandate anything if it is not strictly necessary.
Regards,
// Ola
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: