On Wednesday 01 June 2005 07:53, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > I don't have any hard statistics, but here are some random examples of > patches whose development was sponsored by Canonical, were tested and > proven in Ubuntu, were proactively submitted to Debian by an Ubuntu > developer, and remain in debbugs months later without comment from the > maintainer: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=298060 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=298064 I don't think the second one is a very good example either as it seems to assume udeb support and Debian is not there yet. I guess the maintainer could have given a response, but AFAICT implementing the request is not possible for the foreseeable future.
Attachment:
pgpMbVIH0c955.pgp
Description: PGP signature