Re: A way _not_ to handle bugs

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A way _not_ to handle bugs
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 16:01:52 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050504140152.GA10453@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050504135726.GA16949@projectcolo.org.uk>
References: <[🔎] 20050503102732.GD3592@stusta.de> <[🔎] 87d5s81g4x.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 20050503161546.GH3592@stusta.de> <[🔎] 87mzrcl1kt.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 20050504113352.GL3592@stusta.de> <[🔎] 20050504135726.GA16949@projectcolo.org.uk>

* Mark Brown (broonie@sirena.org.uk) [050504 16:00]:
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:33:52PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> > I didn't know a bug can have more than one submitter.
> 
> > What's the syntax for the email to control@bugs for adding a second 
> > submitter?

> Not entirely the answer you're looking for, but submit a duplicate bug
> and merge it.

No, don't do that.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A way _not_ to handle bugs
  - From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>

References:
- A way _not_ to handle bugs
  - From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
- Re: A way _not_ to handle bugs
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: A way _not_ to handle bugs
  - From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
- Re: A way _not_ to handle bugs
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: A way _not_ to handle bugs
  - From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
- Re: A way _not_ to handle bugs
  - From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: A way _not_ to handle bugs
Next by Date: Re: Rekall for Debian ?
Previous by thread: Re: A way _not_ to handle bugs
Next by thread: Re: A way _not_ to handle bugs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread