Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications)
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 10:37:25PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:04:08PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 09:52:18AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > > As you say, _most_ of the issues are triggered by one of those three
> > > chips, not all. And, by not making a hard requirement to compile the
> > > packages which will not be used, you are not holding the project back
> > > waiting for m68k's KDE. Probably m68k will _never_ compile KDE, as I
> > > doubt their buildds are ever idle
> >
> > kiivi.cyber.ee, the unstable m68k buildd that I maintain, is usually
> > idle for about 30% of the time. /Of course/ we build KDE, there's no
> > point in not doing that.
> >
>
> Why, does it get used on this architecture?
<http://www.grep.be/blog/2004/01/12#2742>
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Reply to: