On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:05:59PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 01-Apr-05, 10:08 (CST), Frank K?ster <frank@debian.org> wrote: > > I do not think that this bug justifies auctex's removal from testing; on > > the other hand, I don't think it would be proper to lower its severity > > before we know more. But we cannot know whether the submitter will > > answer again and allow us to decide, and possibly fix or reassign, > > before sarge is frozen. > > How should this bug be handled? > Downgrade it, tag it as unreproducible (or whatever that exact tag is), > and don't worry about it. It's clearly not 'grave', since it doesn't > seem to affect anyone else, and presumably the submitter is not the only > Debian auctex user . Just to confirm, this is the release team's policy on handling such bugs. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature