Re: Bad Sig (was: Re: Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config))
* Wouter Verhelst [Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:15:35 +0100]:
> Op wo, 02-02-2005 te 13:53 +0100, schreef Bas Zoetekouw:
> > Hi David!
> > > Me too, but I noticed an escaped >From in the message and didn't investigate
> > > further.
> > AFAIK, gpg signs the body only.
> Yes, but a leading 'From' on a line will be escaped to '>From' in
> transit. This is because some software will otherwise interpret the
> leading from to be the start of a new message (it's a bit too close to
> the mbox format start)
/me hugs mutt's $encode_from.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
As an adolescent I aspired to lasting fame, I craved factual certainty,
and I thirsted for a meaningful vision of human life -- so I became a
scientist. This is like becoming an archbishop so you can meet girls.
-- Matt Cartmill
Reply to:
- References:
- Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config)
- From: Raphael Bossek <raphael.bossek@gmx.de>
- Re: Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config)
- From: Adrian von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>
- Bad Sig (was: Re: Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config))
- From: David Schmitt <david@schmitt.edv-bus.at>
- Re: Bad Sig (was: Re: Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config))
- From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>
- Re: Bad Sig (was: Re: Diversion of APT tools by dpkg-cross (apt-get,apt-cache,apt-config))
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@nixsys.be>