[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS tag?



hi,
* Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es> [2005-01-05 18:02]:
> * Nico Golde [Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:50:42 +0100]:
> > From: Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de>
> > To: debian-devel@ngolde.de
>       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>       is there a reason for this? breaks mutt's 'L'ist-reply...
> 
> > Hi,
> > what about an RFS tag for ITPs or and RFS bug report for
> > wnpp. So debian developers who like to sponsor a package
> > don't have to read debian-mentors.
> > I think it would be a good idea.
> 
>   Justin Pryzby has been working lately on this. you may find this thread
>   [1] on -mentors interesting. I particularly like and fully support
>   jvw's suggestion [2] about the forwarded status. for a more-bloated
>   proposal, also from Justin, see [3].

ah ok thanks. maybe i will contact him.
regards nico
-- 
Nico Golde - 310777820@ICQ | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF ,'"`.
nico@ngolde.de | http://www.ngolde.de           (  grml.org
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps    `._,'   
and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: