Re: Accepted mozilla 2:1.7.5-1 (i386 source)
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 11:02 schrieb Takuo KITAME:
> mozilla (2:1.7.5-1) unstable; urgency=high
> .
> * New upstream release (closes: Bug#288047,Bug#288044,Bug#287111,
> Bug#277515)
ARGS. Two of those bugs at least are *NOT* "new upstream release" type bugs.
Is it really to hard to write sensible changeslog which actually say *what*
was fixed (needed for looking offline when needed...)
Is it too hard to e.g. write?:
* New upstream release: (closes: #...)
- fixes NNTP security problem (closes: #...)
- fixes this (closes: #...)
- now foo is done (closes: ##...)
[...]
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Reply to: