On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 09:17:43AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > On Monday 03 January 2005 07:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> wrote: > > This is true whether the bad things are false positives in email or > > the deaths of hundreds of people. Certainly deaths are worse, but I > > wasn't comparing false positives to deaths. > > I was explaining why your style of excuse is never acceptible. If > > false positives are bad (and they are), they do not become less bad > > because you cannot figure out how to avoid them and still achieve your > > goals. > There is no comparison between killing people and bouncing email. Whatever > point you were trying to make is lost. The thread is over. Maybe the real point here is that no one has come up with a spam control solution yet that involves killing spammers. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature