[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: QPL and non-free

Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org> wrote:
> Wesley J. Landaker writes:
>> Readers should also note that the FSF believes[1] that the QPL is a free 
>> license; but it's not GPL compatible.
> This does not mean a lot.  They believe the same thing of the GNU FDL,
> but the FDL is non-DFSG-free in the general case.

I don't think the FSF have ever claimed that the GFDL would class as a
free software license. Their standards for free documentation licenses
are clearly different to the DFSG.

Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.legal@srcf.ucam.org

Reply to: