Re: ldd -u (Re: Solving recursive dependency disease in KDE-based packages)
> * Nathanael Nerode [Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:35:41 -0500]:
> > To work out which libraries you're linked to which you don't actually
> > ldd -u <executable or library> is invaluable.
> This seems like not the case _at all_ to me (the "invaluable" bit):
Yes, it definitely gives lots of false positives. I haven't seen it give a
false negative yet though, which makes it a reasonable starting point.
>For now, I
> plan on sticking to Henning Makholm's "libneeded" lintian check:
Great if you've got it working; I hadn't.