Re: net-tools maintenance status
On 11/29/05, Bernd Eckenfels <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > And nearly four months later, the package has 92 bugs, 16 with patch
> > and a lot even without a single response.
> This is not true.
What part isn't?
> Stop bothering me.
> Most of the patches are not valid.
Shouldn't the patch tag be removed and an explanation given then?
> Please work on the bugs which are tagged as help needed.
Why would I do that while I'm waiting for the status of the patch I