Re: texlive-basic_2005-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Rogério Brito <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Nov 28 2005, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> Hi Jörg, hi ftpmasters!
> Hi, Norbert, Jörg and others.
> Here is the opinion of a long time Debian luser (and DD wannabe), based
> on the naming that I am already used to with other packages.
>> texlive-binaries-source 96M
> What about texlive-bin-base?
> And similarly for all the others:
I think that keeping the package names the same as the texlive
collection names would be a great benefit for the users.
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich