Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 00:56:15 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87br0ahqao.fsf@nahar.marcbrockschmidt.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20051123225808.GB6449@aquarium.takhisis.invalid> (Stefano Zacchiroli's message of "Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:58:08 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 877jb0iswl.fsf@nahar.marcbrockschmidt.de> <[🔎] 20051123225808.GB6449@aquarium.takhisis.invalid>

Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> writes:
[...]
> I will fill a whishlist bugreport against debuild to support dpkg-sig
> side by side with debuild.

There is already #247825. #247824 is the wishlist bug for
dpkg-buildpackage support.

Marc
-- 
BOFH #105:#247824
UPS interrupted the server's power

Attachment: pgpd1tdmix0to.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
  - From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>

References:
- dpkg-sig support wanted?
  - From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@debian.org>
- Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
  - From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>

Prev by Date: finding the number of people subscribed to a bug
Next by Date: Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
Previous by thread: Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
Next by thread: Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread