Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl> writes: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 04:50:02PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: >> As I'm responsible for most of dpkg-sig's code (and planned to do some >> more work in the next two months) I'd like to know if anyone cares about >> using these binary signatures or if I can invest my time into something >> that's a bit more satisfying (== non-Debian stuff). As the ftp-masters >> and the dpkg maintainers seem to have no interest in the whole thing, >> I'm beginning to doubt that it's sensible to work on dpkg-sig. > Just to provide some statistics about dpkg-sig usage, as I got curious > about it too: > > In the archive, 525 out of 283283 .deb's are dpkg-sig'd (0.19%). Of these 283283 debs, only ~1/9 (1 of 11 archs - packages that are arch: all, that's only an assumption, correct me if i'm wrong) are directly uploaded by developers. About 1/4 of the pool should be woody packages (which was released before dpkg-sig). So we get 283283 * 1/9 * 3/4, which gives us about 23606 packages, which means that 525 are about 2.25%. Regarding the fact that dpkg-sig is not actively advertised because support in dak and dpkg is still missing, that's not *too* bad. Marc -- Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt 25: Multithreaded Wir mußten ein Flußdiagramm malen, um es zu debuggen. (Kristian Köhntopp)
Attachment:
pgpFFcXb3Nq0x.pgp
Description: PGP signature