[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: master's mail backlog and upgrade time



On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:18:45PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ryan Murray writes ("master's mail backlog and upgrade time"):
> > Also, I've investigated the mail backlog on master and found the main
> > problem.  The mail queue is currently full of email that will never be
> > able to be delivered, all for one particular user.  This mail is being
> > removed from the queue, and the setup changed to not deliver to the
> > problem address.  Once this is finished (a few days), mail latency for
> > mail moving through master should be greatly improved.

> I have now discovered that the `one user' referred to is at least two
> of the users of my colo system, chiark.greenend.org.uk.

Based on specifics (well... more-specific vaguenesses) mentioned by Ryan
elsewhere, I don't believe this is the case.  Chiark appears to be on the
wrong continent to be attached to the user in question, and reducing one to
two seems like a rather incredible off-by-one error to make in this case.

>  * I now discover by reading master's exim4.conf that all mail
>    to the _mail domain_ chiark.greenend.org.uk has been arranged to
>    bounce on master.  This is contrary to what is stated in the
>    announcement, which says that the setup was changed `to not deliver
>    to the problem _address_' (emph. mine).

Well, I certainly see a line in that file relating to chiark, but I have no
exim-fu to understand the precise semantics -- and certainly no idea why
it's there, sorry.

> Regarding the problem and how to solve it:

>  * The mail backlog that `will never be able to be delivered' was
>    (as far as I can tell) all spam that chiark has been properly
>    rejecting.

No: there is nothing "proper" about rejecting mail from a host that you have
configured to forward mail for you.

>  * It is unfortunate that (a) master has such a lax spam policy and
>    that (b) Debian developers cannot choose to make their @debian.org
>    address unuseable other than by the Debian system administrators.

... procmail?

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: