Re: Effort to change IETF's copying conditions for RFCs
- To: Simon Josefsson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com, Peter Samuelson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: Effort to change IETF's copying conditions for RFCs
- From: Florian Weimer <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:21:38 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com> (Simon Josefsson's message of "Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:51:13 +0200")
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <20051015231658.GC3063@p12n.org> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
* Simon Josefsson:
> I received some feedback from the IPR WG, resulting in this wording:
> The Contributor grants third parties the right to
> copy and distribute the Contribution, with or without
> modification, in any medium, without royalty. The IETF
> requests that any citation or excerpt of unmodified text
> reference the RFC or other document from which the text is
> derived. If the text is modified in any way other than
> translation, any claim of endorsement by the IETF or status
> within its document series must be removed.
> This doesn't mention the copyright notice, but if the IETF is
> satisfied with that wording, I think it is fine for me as well.
> Is that license acceptable to the Debian community?
Personally, I think it's okay. I can't speak for the whole community,