Re: Bits from the release team: the plans for etch
- To: Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de>
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bits from the release team: the plans for etch
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:46:02 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87d5lss2md.fsf@becket.becket.net>
- In-reply-to: <20051026130749.GO6026@ns.snowman.net> (Stephen Frost's message of "Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:07:49 -0400")
- References: <E1ETva4-0005iY-MW@scyw00225.scy001.de> <20051024063245.GE19151@tennyson.dodds.net> <20051024141318.GA23768@javifsp.no-ip.org> <E1EU9aO-0001XS-Ui@scyw00225.scy001.de> <20051025105240.GA21436@javifsp.no-ip.org> <E1EUOsY-0000Jv-F3@scyw00225.scy001.de> <20051025202118.GA10290@javifsp.no-ip.org> <E1EUecU-0004QS-NV@scyw00225.scy001.de> <20051026091100.GA3940@javifsp.no-ip.org> <E1EUiKp-0005zI-4A@scyw00225.scy001.de> <20051026130749.GO6026@ns.snowman.net>
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> I disagree with the idea that removing a user is a bug. If the user was
> added by the package, and the package is being purged, and there's a
> reasonable expectation that it wasn't used outside of the package's use
> of it then I think it's probably safe to remove it.
How do you acquire that expectation?
Reply to: