[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits from the release team: the plans for etch

On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 01:12:49PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 08:59:01AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 02:56:57PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > Paul TBBle Hampson <Paul.Hampson@anu.edu.au> writes:
> > > > Didn't there used to be a delayed queue for NMUs to go into so that the
> > > > maintainer has time to nix it if neccessary? ^_^
> > > 
> > > Sure, but at the moment, I only know one way to use dupload since the
> > > upload queues were changed.
> > 
> > This .dupload.conf fragment has been working for me for some time:
> IIRC I updated dupload through a NMU a while back to add the new DELAYED
> queue in the stock dupload configuration files.

yes, as did i.  as it's still an NMU in progress, i'll be interested to
see if it eventually makes it to ftp-master :)  it is moving from
$n-delayed to ${n-1}-delayed though.

fwiw: i believe the cmdline i used was:

dput -e 7 gluck_delayed foo.changes



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: