[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: real-i386 (was Re: i386 requalification for etch

* Nathanael Nerode:

> In gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0, these functions have been replaced with out-of-line 
> functions, implemented in libstdc++.

Do these out-of-line functions avoid the LOCK prefix overhead on
non-SMP systems or, at least, non-threaded programs (for example,
using some dynamic linker magic)?

Reply to: