[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: localhost.localdomain

Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> The only reason I find is that RedHat use it. But RedHat shouldn't be
> debians requirement of quality. It should be other way around. RedHat is
> such a buggy distribution. And it gets more and more worse every
> upgrade.

Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> But why changing "localhost" to "localhost.localdomain" only for the
> reason that RedHat doing it? 

Christoph Haas wrote:
> "RedHat does it" isn't a good argument for me either.

I'd just like to point out that the whole idea that this was somehow
influenced by Red Hat is a red er, herring. d-i is a thouroguhly NIH
enterprise, we obviously don't follow the lead of Red Hat.

In the future, please try to limit your posts to those that contain
provable facts.

see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: