[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: localhost.localdomain



Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> The only reason I find is that RedHat use it. But RedHat shouldn't be
> debians requirement of quality. It should be other way around. RedHat is
> such a buggy distribution. And it gets more and more worse every
> upgrade.

Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> But why changing "localhost" to "localhost.localdomain" only for the
> reason that RedHat doing it? 

Christoph Haas wrote:
> "RedHat does it" isn't a good argument for me either.

I'd just like to point out that the whole idea that this was somehow
influenced by Red Hat is a red er, herring. d-i is a thouroguhly NIH
enterprise, we obviously don't follow the lead of Red Hat.

In the future, please try to limit your posts to those that contain
provable facts.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: