Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8

To: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:24:21 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 20051006142421.GE13995@khazad-dum.debian.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4344C52F.1080601@aurel32.net>
References: <E1ENHwq-0008Lm-00@spohr.debian.org> <[🔎] 4344C52F.1080601@aurel32.net>

Is there any chances of versioning openssl symbols properly?

I am not asking for 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 to coexist (although versioned symbols
would make that trivial), but PLEASE version the symbols.

Suggested version tag:  OPENSSL_0_9_8

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8
  - From: Alastair McKinstry <alastair.mckinstry@ildana.net>

References:
- Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8
  - From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8
Next by Date: Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8
Previous by thread: Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8
Next by thread: Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread