Re: nonpublic shared libraries (repost; was: Re: dh_shlibdeps in = warnings; dh_shlibdeps out = cyclic dependency on self)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: nonpublic shared libraries (repost; was: Re: dh_shlibdeps in = warnings; dh_shlibdeps out = cyclic dependency on self)
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 02:55:39 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050912005539.GA22197@wonderland.linux.it>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050911221837.GA5332@andromeda>
References: <60381eeb05090603101f97c464@mail.gmail.com> <20050906151744.GA3655@andromeda> <877jdu42bd.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20050906163459.GC3655@andromeda> <87psrm2jza.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20050906180315.GA3967@andromeda> <20050907152445.GC4536@andromeda> <[🔎] 20050911221837.GA5332@andromeda>

On Sep 12, Justin Pryzby <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> This was originally sent to -mentors, but elicited no response, so I'm
> reposting here:
I agree with the answer by Peter Samuelson.
Most of the policy requirements about libraries are only relevant if
they are shared among non-cooperating packages.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- nonpublic shared libraries (repost; was: Re: dh_shlibdeps in = warnings; dh_shlibdeps out = cyclic dependency on self)
  - From: Justin Pryzby <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net>

Prev by Date: Re: nonpublic shared libraries (repost; was: Re: dh_shlibdeps in = warnings; dh_shlibdeps out = cyclic dependency on self)
Next by Date: Re: curl situation is intolerable
Previous by thread: Re: nonpublic shared libraries (repost; was: Re: dh_shlibdeps in = warnings; dh_shlibdeps out = cyclic dependency on self)
Next by thread: Stop Spam
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread