Re: Do we still need libc5?
Florian Weimer <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> * Roger Leigh:
>> We can't provide proper security support, and by now, libc5 is likely
>> full of holes, so IMO it's best if we drop it. It's not like there's
>> any active maintenance or we can do any serious work on it: it's dead
>> If users need it, they can always grab a sarge (or older) CD and
>> install from that.
> I agree. Security support would have made the difference, but the
> rest you can get from a CD.
To follow up to the original report, the full package list for removal
(and applicable RC bugs) are as follows:
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.